Starbucks’ Service Commitment, Starbucks Service Moment

Starbucks’ Service Commitment, Starbucks Service Moment:
An excellent quick overview of the commitment some companies are willing to make to improving their customer service and a great story from the frontline of the wider impact Magic Moments can have.

Whilst it is difficult to measure that impact it is certain the moments like this make customers feel more significant and the on the old hierarchy of needs that’s right up there. If I can have a retail experience that also makes me feel significant I’m going to get quite loyal to that brand. How else would Apple have survived the debacle that was the iPhone 3G launch without loyal customers who were looking for more than just a phone and so were willing to put up with the annoyances of getting the ‘phone’ bit right.

What Magic Moments are you creating for your customers now? What would need to happen for you to be able to take a “moment”, as Starbucks have done, to get with your front-line and get everyone motivated to create excellent experiences for your customers?

dancingmango » What is it that makes your product distinctive?

dancingmango » What is it that makes your product distinctive?:

My recently easternised friend and excellent customer experience dude, Marc McNeill, has found a fantastic interview with The Master Brewer for Guinness. In the world of technology and consumer products/services we might equate him to a Product Manager/Developer. He has an on the ground responsibility for producing the end-product.

Our Master brewer shows that his priorities lie with an overall customer experience and how his product features (flavour, colour etc) fit in with that… the actual product features are the last thing he mentions.

Marc challenges us to think about what this means for the way that we organise ourselves around defining the customer experience in the context of developing innovative and irresistible products

There are very few master brewers who go beyond just satisfying their customers with features and functionality, to focus upon delivering “a great all round experience”. To turn the mediocre and mundane into theatre. Like Apple have done with the iPhone. Like Guinness do with their stout. Yet something gets lost as you move away from the strategic owners of the Brand, to those responsible for tactical implementations. And this loss can obviously be costly. If the Guinness Master Brewer was only responsible for a drink that is an acquired taste, would it still be the sixth top ranked global Beer brand?

This is an example from a single product world, but in many companies we are dealing with developing individual products that bundle together to form the consumer proposition. Understanding how we can enable our Master Brewers to be responsible for excellent flavour that complements the rest of the products on our menu is key to being able to offer value at a consumer level and understand the profitability of our component products…

I would look to companies such as Apple, Telcos (where there are often many components to the end-bundle a customer might buy) and premium financial services to see how they organise themselves around understanding customer needs and delivering a selection of products to them that together create an overall experience. There is a lot an organisation needs to do to be able to deliver an end to end experience across a range of products and services. Guiness has the luxury of being fairly single-product minded… for the rest of us we need to make sure our organisation is lined up to deliver not just our product developers…

Can Payroll be linked to Increased Sales?

I was recently in our local B&Q DIY store and followed a classic strategy of mine to solve our “sanding and varnishing” challenge.

  • Research the product online
  • Check product availability
  • Check store location and opening times
  • Go to store to get more information and purchase

This store certainly had a large range of products in the section we needed, some were fully in stock and some weren’t however it wasn’t until I was able to talk to a very knowledgeable employee that I was able to be confident that what I needed…

  1. existed and
  2. was in stock in this store and could therefore
  3. make a purchase.

We had, to be fair, been in another store earlier and not found what we needed… but in that store there was no-one knowledgeable to help us. We left confident that there was no stock of what we wanted to purchase… and went to another store (fortunately for B&Q another of theirs…)

So I was interested to stumble upon a Wharton Business School article which links the satisfaction of customer experience especially around stock availability and making purchases with… yes you guessed it… knowledgeable staff.

In short, customers get lower satisfaction from their shopping experience when stores have too few employees and, more importantly, when stores lack employees who are knowledgeable about what’s in the store.

Further more the study actually links increases and reallocations of payroll (around staff availability and knowledgeable staff) to increase in sales via increased customer experience scores. At times they were able to show an $1 increase on a staff member to a $4-$28 increase in sales!!!

So before you jump straight to your supply chain technology, or customer relationship database to see where you can eak out a better bang for your buck, may be this week have a look at where you are investing in some of your most valuable assets and see how you can better leverage your staff to deliver a consistent, excellent customer experience…

I would be willing to bet that the store we finally purchased from, whilst bigger, was not more successful because of size of stock availability but actually because of the range of knowledgeable staff it was able to support in guiding customers through their in-store experience.

The full report is available on Knowledge@Wharton (free to register) which is an excellent resource for all Business related research including the many ways in which customer experience is becoming more and more integrated into boardroom level decision making strategies.

Using Storyboarding to Communicate to Your Audience…

I’ve been following a few posts on “the secret to twitter” interested as I am on how people evolve their use of social technology to fit their needs.

Interesting in itself but I thought I’d revisit the Twitter home page to remind myself what they thought the secret to twitter was and I was pleasantly surprised by their method of communicating how to use twitter.


Twitter in Plain English from leelefever on Vimeo.

The video was produced by CommonCraft whose sole purpose is to produce videos to explain things in plain english! I think these guys are MUCH needed and their web-site states:-

“**please note** Our schedule is currently full for many months and we are not adding new projects to the schedule at this time.

A clear indicator that they are doing something right!

The Twitter video is a great example of how storyboarding and paper-prototyping can be used to clearly communicate purpose and function…

Now I’m off to watch a video on Blogs in Plain English see if I can’t learn something…

The bad table

I thought that Seth’s recent musing on restaurant service levels has something for us all to think about with regards our service offerings. He describes being offered the “worst table” in the restaurant, when he asked for an alternative table the one he pointed out was declared “reserved”…

Do you have a “worst table” that some of your customers end up with? Do you have a “best table” and how do you decide who gets that?

The bad table:
marketing dilemma: who should get your best effort? Should it be the new customer who you just might be able to convert into a long-term customer? Or should it be the loyal customer who is already valuable? Sorry, but the answer is this: you can’t have a bad table.

Here in the UK we have a great advert for Nationwide which makes similar points about customer service but from the flip-side:-

The “New Customers Only” mantra of promotions that are only available if you are a valuable (in this instance, new) customer…

Every offering, every level of service, every product you have should offer value at a level that means something to your customers new or established.  It is of course the case that ’some’ of your offerings will be objectively compared to others and found to be ‘better’.

I think the lesson here is that you shouldn’t hold back on your good stuff just in case a better customer comes along.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Two Levels of Retail Value:- “Do you have” vs. “Do you want”

200803190301
Brand Autopsy: Borders Reducing its Borders:

Borders recently tested a front-facing display strategy where more books were stocked with their covers, not spines, facing customers. Sales increased by 9.0%. The strategy was so successful, all Borders bookstores will be switching to the front-facing strategy in the next couple of weeks.

This will mean reducing their stock in stores by anywhere between 4700 and 9300. However research showed that customers actually perceived an increase in stock following this strategy.

Seth Godin has a very interesting take on this that relates to the Two Levels of Retail Value that I discuss with my coaching clients - “Do you have” vs. “Do you want” the change in strategy from Borders is an interesting Customer Experience strategy that will have a measurable impact on the bottom line (I’m not going to predict which way it goes in the long-run yet) and is based around increasing the level of value that the store experience operates at…

Essentially stocking everything with the spine facing out is saying we are packing in as much as we can and we expect to have whatever you need… putting the covers of the books out is saying to the customer “Have you seen me…? you might WANT me?”. As Want is a higher level of value than need, we should expect the return on this strategy change to be significant…

If I can find any results over the next few months I’ll keep you posted.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

When designing for the customer may not be the best thing…

Jason of 37Signals has written a passionate article on Why we disagree with Don Norman: following Don Norman’s critique of 37Signals approach to design.

I’m going to let Jason do most of the talking because he has written this so well… but to set some context… Don Norman was critiquing 37Signals for designing for themselves BEFORE designing for the customer, in fact he seems to imply he thought they weren’t designing for customers at all.

What is excellent about this posting is that Jason is spot in pointing out that the worlds best innovators and creators have all come from a position of thinking about themselves first and Jason articulates very well the speed that this allows 37Signals to design at. He also highlights that they ARE VERY customer focussed in how they then amend, iterate and improve on original thinking…

It always seems a bit strange to hear a customer experience expert say “The customer doesn’t know what they want…” but it is often true especially when you are developing propositions on the boundaries of what exists today in the mass market…

Go 37Signals!!!

Olympus creates ‘world’s smallest questionnaire’ on specimen slide - Engadget

I love this… talk about ‘getting’ your customers. Not only does this feedback form ask the customer how excited or titilated they get when they can ’see the clear ridges on a piece of bacteria’ but Olympus have gone that extra mile and actually produced this feedback form ON one of the very specimen slides they are seeking to get feedback from…

Now of course in reality they weren’t garnering feedback so much as plugging their site (Which saw a 24% increase in traffic by the way) however whether you want to see this as genius marketing push or an example of how to talk to your customers, it’s a great story…

Possibly the world’s smallest questionnaire but also possibly one of the most in-tune!

 Www.Engadget.Com Media 2007 09 9-24-07-Olympusslidezoom

Olympus creates ‘world’s smallest questionnaire’ on specimen slide - Engadget:

Multi-Touch Interfaces a la Minority Report from your Wii

Johnny Lee has signalled the ease with which multi-touch interfaces can be built out of a few reflective pieces of tape, an old TV and a Wii remote!!!! It’s genius. I’ mean yes it’s cool because it’s a hack and geeks love hacks, but it’s also cool because multi-touch has the potential to deliver some seriously intuitive interfaces in the now very near future…

Johnny Chung Lee - Projects - Wii:

You should take some time to watch each one… the story build’s up but for me it was most exciting when we got to the 3D model… although only demonstrating the make-shift headset that tracks your movement to re-map the ‘3D’ space you can imagine what it would be liked combined with his multi-touch work.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,


Continue reading ‘Multi-Touch Interfaces a la Minority Report from your Wii’

Platform for Growth I - Seth Godin on “The forces of mediocrity”

Seth Godin (The forces of mediocrity) has hit on a lesson that I think a lot of people still need to learn. “The forces FOR mediocrity” a mass movement that one must swim against in order to achieve most innovations and differentiations in a marketplace.
In my role as a coach to entrepreneurs and even as a customer experience coach I find a lot of people wanting to find the quick-hit, easy low-hanging fruit, quick-win strategy… basically… hardly any one wants to put in the hard-work. Everyone wants to be “different” or “successful” or “compelling and engaging” but they want to do it in some tried and tested AND easy way…

As Seth says “There’s a myth that all you need to do is outline your vision and prove it’s right - then quite suddenly, people will line up and support you.”

Seth points out that you will invariably encounter large amounts of resistance. Richard Branson in an interview for an upcoming technology conference is quoted as saying that the majority of the ideas for customer experience that he has had have come from his own burning desire to change things, Steve Jobs has always had a passion for making the world a better place through technology and information, he was FIRED from his own company for his vision… it ain’t necessarily easy being that innovative…

but as Seth also says “If it were any other way, everyone would do it and your work would ultimately be devalued”…

However, in the face of all this adversity, what all of the world’s most succesful people do find easy are the decision they have to make when they weigh them up against the values, inspiration and vision that they have. The vision becomes an incredibly clear compass for which direction is the right path… even when the people surrounding you are going in the opposite direction. If you have the tenacity and perserverance to get through the initial cycles of business growth around your new idea then the market you want to play in will be attracted to you, just don’t expect it overnight…

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,